motherjones:

“All the hopes and good press, the inaugural episodes of Girls amount to little more than inertia disguised as quirkiness, stock narrative masquerading as art, and peskiness paraded as high comedy.”

Guess he wasn’t into it. 

“Strip away the forced indie conventions and the pretense of big-city grit, and you’re left with a show that receives all the marketing benefits of flying under the coveted HBO banner, but one that has all the creative energy and maturity of Are You There, Chelsea?”

DAMN.

Source: motherjones
  1. annearchynow said: It might be cool for a lady to review it, since it’s such a lady-experience centered show.
  2. ultralaser reblogged this from wordsandturds
  3. not2hate reblogged this from motherjones and added:
    “Strip away the forced indie conventions and the pretense of big-city grit, and you’re left with a show that receives...
  4. xoxogossipgita reblogged this from motherjones and added:
    “When watching HBO’s new, hotly hyped Girls, one thing is clear from the get-go: Hipstersare really going to like this...
  5. motherjones posted this